HANDS-ON AI IMPLEMENTATION
You set the direction.
I help your team make it real.
Turn a CEO’s AI mandate into working finance and operations workflows—with a clear owner, trained people, and results you can measure.
Work directly with Christopher Peters, M.Ap.Stat.
Monthly management reporting
Approved exports, prior reports, source notes
Reconcile inputs. Flag exceptions. Cite sources.
Review, correct, approve, then distribute.
Cycle time · Rework · Cost per report
Former Principal Data Scientist, Zapier
Former Chief Scientist, Touch AI
Meet Christopher ↗THE GAP BETWEEN INTENT & EXECUTION
Your controller is closing the books. Your operations lead is keeping the business moving. A new AI initiative needs someone to own the implementation.
I work alongside your team to find a valuable starting point, connect the tools, test the outputs, and make the new workflow part of the working week.
Best fit: CEOs, CFOs, and COOs of service businesses with roughly $10M–$250M in revenue, including PE-backed companies, with recurring administrative work and a small team responsible for it.
Start with the work that repeats ↓WHERE WE START
Choose a starting point to see how a pilot could work. These are examples of scope, not client results.
Bring approved financial exports together, surface variances, and draft source-linked commentary for management reporting.
Extract the useful details from inbound requests, check for missing information, and prepare the next action in your existing systems.
Help employees find answers in approved policies and operating procedures, with links back to the documents and access appropriate to their role.
A CLEAR WAY TO BUY
Each phase is a separate decision. Agree on the scope and acceptance criteria before work begins.
01 / FIND THE OPPORTUNITY
$5,000 fixed fee · 2 weeks
Find the first workflow worth improving and make the investment case.
A decision-ready plan; implementation is separate.
02 / PUT IT TO WORK
From $20,000 typically 4–6 weeks
Build and test one recurring workflow with the people who use it.
Final fee and timing follow technical discovery.
03 / KEEP IMPROVING
From $4,000 per month · optional
Keep deployed workflows useful and help leadership decide what comes next.
New builds scoped separately. Business-hours support.
USD. Software, model usage, and applicable taxes are additional. Timelines assume agreed access and an available workflow owner. Each engagement starts with a written scope; this page is not a guarantee of savings.
CHECK THE ECONOMICS
Explore a workflow’s potential with your own assumptions. All figures are illustrative and calculated in your browser.
ILLUSTRATIVE ANNUAL CAPACITY
$46,800
624 team hours recovered per year
Capacity value is time × labor cost. It becomes cash savings only if actual spending falls. Redeployment, adoption, review time, and quality affect realized value.
Annual hours = weekly hours × time reduction × 52. Gross capacity value = annual hours × loaded hourly cost. Year-one net capacity value = gross capacity value − (monthly software and support × 12) − one-time costs. Time reduction should be net of human review and maintenance effort. This simple scenario assumes a full year at steady state; rollout delays and ramp-up reduce first-year value. The default $500/month assumes internal ownership and excludes the optional $4,000/month Operating Partner plan. Enter your full expected costs.
BUILT FOR THE PEOPLE DOING THE WORK
A CEO sponsor, a workflow owner, and a practical review cadence. I handle the build; your team helps define what good looks like.
Approved data sources, scoped permissions, test cases, human approval, and a manual fallback. Sensitive data requirements are agreed before access.
Compare cycle time, rework, quality, and total cost against the baseline. Expand when the evidence supports it; adjust or stop when it doesn’t.
YOUR IMPLEMENTATION PARTNER
I bring applied statistics, software engineering, and experience building data systems at Zapier and Touch AI. You work directly with me on the workflow and the evidence that it is helping.
More about my background ↗
BEFORE WE TALK
We can build a firm-wide roadmap, then work through it in phases. The first engagement focuses on one department and a pilot that can establish a repeatable approach for the next team.
We start with your existing systems and approved vendors. Model choice follows the workflow, access requirements, quality, and cost. Any additional licenses or integrations are agreed in the scope.
The assessment includes up to three stakeholder interviews and a readout. A pilot needs a named owner, access to representative inputs, a weekly working session, and time for user testing. We agree on that commitment before starting.
Start with administrative work and approved, de-identified or synthetic examples where appropriate. Production access depends on your security review, contractual requirements, vendor approvals, and data-handling rules. Clinical decisions, payment execution, and autonomous journal posting are outside the initial pilot.
You still receive the workflow analysis, constraints, and recommendation. Stopping is a valid outcome. The assessment does not commit you to implementation.
No. The initial measures are throughput, turnaround, quality, and time returned to the team. We distinguish usable capacity from actual reductions in spending.
The scope defines ownership and any third-party licenses. The intended delivery includes workflow documentation, configuration or source code produced for your project, and a handoff to your internal owner. Support and new development are separate decisions.
LET’S FIND THE FIRST USEFUL WIN
Bring one recurring workflow and the result you want.
We’ll discuss fit, constraints, and a sensible first scope.
A direct conversation. No purchase commitment.