Vistra Corp. VST

Revenue Intelligence Report • 37 quarters of SEC filing data • Updated 2026-03-15

In a log-log model, SG&A spending shows an elasticity of about 1.11 on revenue, implying a 1% increase in SG&A is associated with roughly a 1.11% rise in revenue. However, model accuracy is limited: the holdout forecast missed by 13% (predicted $5.2B vs actual $4.6B) and the overall MAPE is 20.9%, signaling meaningful uncertainty in forecasting ROI from SG&A spending. The latest quarterly revenue is 4.584B, while the FY outlook calls for about 23B, up 28.1% year over year, indicating a strong growth trajectory. Investors should weigh the positive revenue responsiveness to SG&A spend against the model's accuracy gaps and the ambitious full-year forecast when evaluating the sustainability and ROI of the company's spending and growth outlook.

Investment Thesis

At 20.9% MAPE, the model captures Vistra Corp.'s broad revenue trajectory, though quarterly variability suggests sensitivity to external factors. Sales & marketing spend shows a 1.11x elasticity, suggesting effective go-to-market execution.

Next FY Revenue
$22.7B
+28.1% YoY
SG&A Elasticity
1.11x
Model Accuracy
20.9% MAPE
Holdout validation: The model predicted $5.2B vs the actual $4.6B — an error of 13.0%.
Note: Vistra Corp. does not report R&D expenses separately. This analysis uses SG&A spending only.

Revenue Forecast

VST Revenue Forecast

Quarterly Detail

QuarterModel ForecastActual95% RangeYoY GrowthStatus
Q4 2025 $5.2B $4.6B $3.0B – $8.8B +28.3% ✓ In range
Q2 2026 $5.4B $2.5B – $11B +36.7%
Q3 2026 $5.6B $2.2B – $14B +31.2%
Q4 2026 $5.8B $2.0B – $17B +16.2%
Q4 2026 $6.0B $1.8B – $20B +30.6%

Seasonal Factors

Multiplicative seasonal adjustment: These factors capture Vistra Corp.'s systematic quarterly revenue patterns relative to the trend model. A factor of 1.05 means that quarter typically runs 5% above the underlying trend; 0.95 means 5% below. Factors are computed as the median of (actual / fitted) across all available quarters.
Fiscal QuarterSeasonal Factorvs TrendInterpretationObs.
FQ1 (Sep–Nov) 1.2768 +27.7% +27.7% above trend 9
FQ2 (Dec–Feb) 0.8878 -11.2% -11.2% below trend 9
FQ3 (Mar–May) 1.0376 +3.8% +3.8% above trend 9
FQ4 (Jun–Aug) 0.9425 -5.8% -5.8% below trend 9

How Spending Drives Revenue

VST Spending Timing
Reading this chart: Each line shows the cumulative elasticity — how a 1% increase in spending translates to revenue growth over subsequent quarters. The effect builds over 4-5 quarters as investments compound.

Want this analysis for your portfolio?

I build custom revenue intelligence reports for investors and companies using SEC filing data, econometric modeling, and AI-powered insights.

Get in Touch

More in Utilities

ECL LIN GEV WM