Measure the token input
Join input and output tokens to workflow, model, customer, unit cost, and the operating context in which they were consumed.
Token economics
Tokens are the measurable production input. Incremental EBITDA is the executive outcome. I help companies estimate the curve between them—connecting revenue lift, gross margin, labor savings, and cost-to-serve to the tokens that produced the change.
Get a defensible answer your CFO, board, and operating leaders can use to decide what to scale, fix, or stop.
Independent analysis. Decision-ready evidence. No vendor scorekeeping.
When token use increases, how much incremental EBITDA follows?
The measurement problem
A usage dashboard tells you how many tokens were consumed. Token economics estimates the incremental gross profit and operating savings those tokens produced, whether marginal returns are flattening, and how much EBITDA would have happened anyway.
Join input and output tokens to workflow, model, customer, unit cost, and the operating context in which they were consumed.
Translate revenue lift through gross margin, add operating savings, and subtract incremental AI operating costs to reach EBITDA contribution.
Use experiments or econometric designs to estimate marginal EBITDA per million tokens, uncertainty, and diminishing returns.
Identify where another million tokens is likely to create the most EBITDA—and where usage should be rerouted, redesigned, or stopped.
Built for your situation
The EBITDA impact depends on your margins, workflow mix, adoption, counterfactual, model routing, labor design, and what decision must be made. The analysis should be built around those facts—not around generic assumptions.
Revenue lift, gross margin, operating savings, quality effects, and AI costs enter differently for every business.
Token usage is not the treatment by itself. We define what would have happened without the AI workflow or with a different operating policy.
Average ROI can hide saturation. We estimate where marginal tokens still create EBITDA and where returns begin to flatten.
Scaling, routing, vendor selection, workflow redesign, and budget allocation each require a different model and level of evidence.
The engagement
Confidential conversation
Tell me where your AI program stands and which EBITDA decision is blocked. I’ll review the measurement question and follow up directly.
Your inquiry is stored privately and used only to respond to you.
FAQ
AI ROI estimates net incremental EBITDA contribution relative to total AI cost. Token volume is the measurable production input; the EBITDA bridge is the financial output.
It reveals the production curve: how incremental EBITDA changes as token consumption grows, where marginal returns begin to flatten, and whether the next block of usage is likely to pay back.
Include model/API costs, software subscriptions, infrastructure, implementation costs, and ongoing labor where relevant.
Often, yes. The right quasi-experimental or time-series design depends on rollout timing, comparison groups, outcome frequency, and how adoption was assigned.
The first step is a measurement audit: identify what can be estimated now, which assumptions matter most, and what instrumentation would make the next decision more credible.