Architecture & readiness
Pressure-test the use case, data sources, retrieval design, and deployment plan.
What you take away
A technical assessment, prioritized risks, and a practical roadmap for the next iteration.
Technical guidance & hands-on support
Build on what’s working. Understand what needs to change. Get practical help turning a promising RAG prototype into a useful part of your business.
Architecture, retrieval quality, and answer evaluation, with support for the decisions and implementation work along the way.
Ways to work together
Start with a focused review, bring in implementation help, or establish an ongoing working rhythm. Each engagement has an agreed scope and deliverables.
Pressure-test the use case, data sources, retrieval design, and deployment plan.
A technical assessment, prioritized risks, and a practical roadmap for the next iteration.
Investigate weak answers, build representative test questions, and compare changes to the pipeline.
A baseline, failure analysis, and recommendations supported by evaluation results.
Work alongside your team on ingestion, search, citations, integration, and operational checks.
Agreed implementation work, team handoff, and an optional plan for ongoing review and support.
Start with the symptom
Document coverage, parsing, chunk boundaries, metadata, retrieval recall, and ranking.
Whether the retrieved passages support the answer, how citations are produced, and when the system should decline to answer.
Permissions, document freshness, representative evaluations, latency, cost, and monitoring.
How we work
We start with actual user questions and the decisions your team needs to make. The work connects technical changes to observable outcomes.
Discuss an engagementReview your goals, system, source material, and constraints. Agree on what a useful result would look like.
Build or review an evaluation set. Identify recurring failure patterns and choose a focused set of changes.
Compare results, document tradeoffs, and leave your team with clear next steps and the agreed implementation.
Before we start
Looking for a complete system build? Explore RAG systems →
No. A readiness and architecture review can help before you build. If you already have a prototype or a production system, we can focus on specific problems.
Yes. Engagements can include design reviews, paired implementation, evaluation work, and knowledge transfer. We agree on responsibilities and a working rhythm together.
Ongoing work can cover quality reviews, source changes, evaluation maintenance, and technical guidance. Availability, response expectations, and scope are agreed as part of the engagement.
We discuss the problem and expected deliverables first, then agree on a quote and timeline. A focused review and an implementation engagement will have different scopes.
Experience behind the work
Led by Christopher Peters, former Principal Data Scientist at Zapier and Chief Scientist at Touch AI, the practice brings together applied statistics, engineering, and product experience to build and evaluate useful knowledge systems.
About the practiceRAG consulting / Start a conversation
Share what you’re building, what isn’t working, and the kind of support that would help your team move forward.
No mailing list. Your details are used to respond to this inquiry. Please don’t include confidential documents or credentials.
Reaching out through an AI agent?
Authorized agents can contact us by email without a CAPTCHA. Read the service and contact instructions.