Target Corporation TGT

Revenue Intelligence Report • 70 quarters of SEC filing data • Updated 2026-03-15

Target reported revenue of about $101 billion, down 3.5% year over year, underscoring ongoing demand weakness in a highly competitive retail environment. In our econometric model, SG&A elasticity is 0.98x, meaning SG&A tracks revenue almost one-for-one and there is little operating leverage to cushion a topline miss. Our model's MAPE of 2.7% implies a solid average fit, but the holdout underpredicted by 7.6% (predicted $28.1B vs $30.5B actual), signaling forecast risk and potential drift from episodic factors not captured by the long-run specification. With growth tied to topline momentum rather than efficiency gains, margins rely on gross margin, pricing, and mix, making Target particularly sensitive to consumer sentiment, promotional intensity, and competitive dynamics.

Investment Thesis

Our ARDL model tracks Target Corporation's revenue with exceptional precision (2.7% MAPE), indicating highly predictable cash flows. Sales & marketing spend shows a 0.98x elasticity, suggesting effective go-to-market execution.

Next FY Revenue
$101.2B
-3.5% YoY
SG&A Elasticity
0.98x
Model Accuracy
2.7% MAPE
Holdout validation: The model predicted $28B vs the actual $30B — an error of 7.6%.
Note: Target Corporation does not report R&D expenses separately. This analysis uses SG&A spending only.

Revenue Forecast

TGT Revenue Forecast

Quarterly Detail

QuarterModel ForecastActual95% RangeYoY GrowthStatus
Q1 2026 $28B $30B $26B – $30B -9.0% ✗ Outside range
Q2 2026 $25B $23B – $28B +4.9%
Q3 2026 $25B $22B – $28B -0.7%
Q4 2026 $25B $22B – $29B -0.5%
Q1 2027 $26B $22B – $30B -14.8%

Seasonal Factors

Multiplicative seasonal adjustment: These factors capture Target Corporation's systematic quarterly revenue patterns relative to the trend model. A factor of 1.05 means that quarter typically runs 5% above the underlying trend; 0.95 means 5% below. Factors are computed as the median of (actual / fitted) across all available quarters.
Fiscal QuarterSeasonal Factorvs TrendInterpretationObs.
FQ1 (Sep–Nov) 0.9998 -0.0% In line with trend 17
FQ2 (Dec–Feb) 1.0094 +0.9% In line with trend 17
FQ3 (Mar–May) 0.9946 -0.5% In line with trend 16
FQ4 (Jun–Aug) 0.9908 -0.9% In line with trend 16

How Spending Drives Revenue

TGT Spending Timing
Reading this chart: Each line shows the cumulative elasticity — how a 1% increase in spending translates to revenue growth over subsequent quarters. The effect builds over 4-5 quarters as investments compound.

Want this analysis for your portfolio?

I build custom revenue intelligence reports for investors and companies using SEC filing data, econometric modeling, and AI-powered insights.

Get in Touch

More in Consumer Defensive

HSY IFF CL WMT MCD MKC GPC MDLZ